By Doug Ward
I’m always surprised at the common themes that emerge when faculty members talk about teaching.
Goals and challenges transcend disciplinary boundaries, allowing for robust discussions about learning; class design and preparation; assessment; the struggles of students, and other areas of teaching.
In discussions Tuesday at CTE’s Best Practices Institute, faculty members from a dozen disciplines shared aspirations and strategies for improving their classes. Among the speakers was Meagan Patterson, associate professor of psychology, who explained the key elements of backward design and then asked participants to write down goals they hoped to achieve in their classes.
My table included instructors from pharmacy, philosophy, journalism, and health, sports and exercise science. The overlap among the group was remarkable. As I wrote the goals on a whiteboard, nearly everyone in the group nodded in agreement. They, too, had essentially the same goals. Here’s a distilled list:
- Learn basic course concepts (as in science or philosophy)
- Learn basic definitions and moral principles and apply those to specific situations
- Demonstrate a big picture view of a subject
- Apply knowledge to real world problems
- Demonstrate good persuasive writing and an ability to refute opposing positions
- Make connections to other disciplines and ideas
- Demonstrate an ability to synthesize and explain discrete specialty topics learned in a course.
Identification of goals is only the first step of creating or remaking a class. The bigger challenge comes when a faculty members starts to envision ways for students to learn material and to demonstrate their learning.
That’s part of what makes teaching so enjoyable, though, no matter the discipline.
Doug Ward is an associate professor of journalism and a fellow at the Center for Teaching Excellence. You can follow him on Twitter @kuediting.